Problem Pop
Could there be a more vague, more abused, more assumed concept than “pop”? Sure, any single term or label behaves similarly, like a squirming worm impaled on a taxonomic hook, fishing for meaning in the Arts. Yet my reading of pop defaults to its negative origins, wherein lie both its cultural separation from the Arts, and its contextual importation by the Arts. I would argue that little has changed in the Arts in the past half century in terms of pop developing or transforming beyond those post-war battles staged between high and low cultures.
Exclusive to the Magazine
Problem Pop by Philip Brophy is featured in full in Issue 3 of Memo magazine.
Get your hands on the print edition through our online shop or save up to 20% and get free domestic shipping with a subscription.
Related
Before performance art, there was art and music. At the Eastside Gallery in Jolimont in the early 1960s, some artists would exhibit while others just jammed.
I have begun to desire noise. Noise that prompts. Maybe wounds. I want to remember something that feels tangible, and if I have no memory of how this feels I want to create one.
Monash University’s indefinite postponement this week of an exhibition featuring Khaled Sabsabi signals a deepening crisis in Australia’s cultural institutions. In the wake of Creative Australia’s Venice Biennale reversal, we are witnessing a damaging institutional retreat from risk—where the language of care and consultation masks a quiet erosion of artistic and academic freedom.