Are artist collectives collaborative?
Collaboration has become a buzzword among contemporary art’s cultural bureaucrats and market operatives.
Collaboration has become a buzzword among contemporary art’s cultural bureaucrats and market operatives. This officialdom appears out of step with the non-institutional forms of collaboration suggested by the term “collectivity.” And yet artist collectives, as closed-loop systems, are antithetical to the collaborative wellness mantra we are used to hearing in the global high-end culture industry. In this world, “collectives” of cultural, corporate, and market partners collaborate with artist collectives — often awkwardly, as seen at documenta fifteen, curated by Indonesian-based ruangrupa. Without centralised curatorial power, the mega-exhibition’s bureaucratic structures were not prepared for democracy in practice, despite their virtue signalling.
Exclusive to the Magazine
Are artist collectives collaborative? by Lévi McLean is featured in full in Issue 2 of Memo magazine.
Get your hands on the print edition through our online shop or save up to 20% and get free domestic shipping with a subscription.
Related
Before pop, before Warhol, before Hamilton—there was Donald Duck. In a wartime outpost in Papua, Charles Bush painted an eerily prescient vision of mass media’s encroachment. A symptom, not an agent, of pop’s first age, Bush’s work sits uneasily in art history’s timeline.
Anabel Robinson’s paintings function like rooms—lived-in, layered, and shifting between figuration and abstraction. Her work invites a search for entry points, symbols, and hidden meanings.
